طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی مناسب برنامه درسی دوره اول متوسطه مدارس استعدادهای درخشان

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران

2 استاد، برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران

3 استادیار، برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی تهران

4 دانشیار، برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر طراحی و اعتبار سنجی الگوی مناسب  برنامه درسی استعدادهای درخشان بوده است. این پژوهش از نوع پژوهش‌های ترکیبی اکتشافی متوالی از نوع ابزارسازی است که در بخش کیفی از روش مطالعه موردی چندگانه و رویکرد تحلیلی بافت نگاری و در بخش کمی از روش توصیفی از نوع پیماشی استفاده شد. در بخش کیفی با رویکرد نمونه گیری هدفمند و روش نمونه‌گیری معیار 11 نفر از صاحبنظران و متخصصین مورد مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختمند قرار گرفتند و در بخش کمی و جهت اعتباریابی ابزار و الگوی ارائه شده 106 نفر از عوامل اجرایی و آموزشی مدارس متوسطه اول استعدادهای درخشان فارس به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب و پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته 127 گویه‌ای تکمیل گردید. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های کیفی از روش تحلیل مضمون و در بخش کمی از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی استفاده گردید. نتایج تحلیل عناصر نشان داد که عنصر مواد و منابع آموزشی، راهبردهای یاددهی و یادگیری، فعالیت یادگیرنده و گروه‌بندی یادگیرندگان دارای بیشترین قدرت تبیین هستند عناصر دیگر نظیر عنصر زمان، محتوا، هدف و ارزشیابی نیز به ترتیب به عنوان تببین کننده معنادار این مدل مورد تحلیل و بررسی قرار گرفت 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Validation of Appropriate pattern of Curriculum of SAMPAD Junior schools

نویسندگان [English]

  • Younes Gholami 1
  • Hassan Maleki 2
  • Alireza Sadeghi 3
  • Mahdi Mohammadi 4
1 Phd Student of Curiculum, , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran
2 Professor, Curiculum, , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran
3 Assistant Professor , Curiculum, , Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran
4 Associate Professor, Curiculum, Shiraz University
چکیده [English]

The aim of present research has been designing and Validation of appropriate pattern of curriculum of SAMPAD junior schools.This research is combinational design of sequential exploratory in type of toolmaking (instrument- making), which in the quality part was used of multiple case study and histological analytical approach , and in the quantity part was used of descriptive method of scrolling. in the quality part, authorities and specialists were interviewed deeply and half structurally, by guided sampeling approach and benchmark sampling method, and for tool validation and present patern, in the quality part, 106 preforming and educational agents of SAMPAd junior schools of fars were chosen by stratified random sampeling and the assured questionnaire consists of 127 items wascompleted. For analyzing the quality data, the thematic analysis was usedand in the quantity part, confirmatory factor analysis was used. the results of analysis of elements showed that the items of materials and educational sources, teaching and learning strategies, learner activity and grouping of learner are the most .
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Designing
  • validation
  • Curriculum
  • Talented

بهادران، مژگان (1384). بررسی تطبیقی الگوهای جذب و آموزش کودکان تیزهوش سه کشور ایران، انگلستان و آمریکا، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.

باقرپور، معصومه (1397). اثربخشی آموزش مبتنی بر نظریه هوش چندگانه بر مهارت‌های حل مسئله و تفکر نقادانه دانش‌آموزان، فصلنامه پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی سال ششم، شماره سوم پیاپی 23، (زمستان 1397) ص 53 – 64.

پورعاصی اردکانی، اکرم (1389). بررسی سیر تحولات و چالش‌های موجود در آموزش و پرورش دانش‌آموزان تیز هوش در ایران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

جمعی از نویسندگان (1390). مبانی نظری تحول بنیادین در نظام تعلیم و تربیت جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی و شورای عالی آموزش و پرورش.

کاظمی حقیقی، ناصرالدین (1370). عوامل موفقیت معلم از دیدگاه تیزهوش. مجله استعدادهای درخشان. 2، 187-181.

کلباسی، افسانه (1391). ارزیابی برنامه درسی مدارس استعدادهای درخشان در دوره راهنمایی و فرآیند فعلی شناسایی دانش‌آموزان تیزهوش به منظور ارائه یک الگوی مطلوب. رسااله دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه اصفهان.

کرسول (1392). طرح پژوهش: رویکرد کمی، کیفی و آمیخته، ترجمه علیرضا کیامنش و مریم دانای طوس، تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

معافی، محمود (1392). نیازسنجی برنامه درسی مدارس استعدادهای درخشان، طرح پژوهشی، سازمان ملی پرورش استعدادهای درخشان .تهران.

ملکی، حسن (1379). مبانی برنامه‌ریزی درسی آموزش متوسط. تهران: سمت.

ملکی، حسن (1388) مقدمات برنامه‌ریزی درسی. تهران: ویرایش.

ملکی، حسن؛ ابراهیم کافوری؛ خسروی بابادی (1394). بررسی نقش عناصر برنامه درسی کلاین در افت تحصیلی درس ریاضی سال اول دوره اول متوسطه ازدیدگاه شرکای برنامه درسی، فصلنامه پژوهش در برنامه درسی، سال 12، دوره 2، شماره 17، صص 50 – 63.

نقدی وند، صدیقه (1392)، مطالعۀ تطبیقی برنامه درسی استعدادهای درخشان دورۀ اول متوسطه ایران با کشورهای آمریکا، انگلستان و ژاپن، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی. دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی.

یزدانی، مهدی (1391). شناسایی عوامل موثر در بهبود کیفیت برنامه درسی استعدادهای درخشان از دیدگاه کارشناسان و مجریان برنامه درسی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دولتی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی.

 

 

Assouline, S., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.

Behak, F.P. (2012). Developing Lifelong Learning Skills through the Implementation of the Multi literacies Approach. Iifelong Learning International Conference 2012. (3 linc `12). P84.

Benjasom, M. Suhaimi. M.S .(2012). Integration Of The Research Into The Cloakroom For The Ulu Al-Albab Approach In Creating , Nurturing And Building Conductive Environment For Lifelong Learning In Malaysia. Lifelong Learning International Conference 2012(3 linc `12). P1.

Betts, G. T. (2004). The autonomous learner model for the gifted and talented. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 27–56). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., & Hailey, E. P. (2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137–167.

Cao, T. Jung, J, Lee, J. (2017). Assessment in Gifted Education: A Review of the Literature From 2005 to 2016. Journal of Advanced Academics 2017, Vol. 28(3) 163–203.

Cockrell, C. (2014). Project excite. In C. Adams & K. Chandler (Eds.), Effective program models for gifted students from underserved populations (pp. 1-13). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & New, J. K. (2006). Gifted in rural America: Faces of diversity. Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.

Coleman, L. J. (2011). Lived experience, mixed messages, and stigma. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents: Development,relationships, school issues, and counseling needs/interventions (pp. 371–392). Waco, TX:Prufrock Press

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing andconducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., & Cheng, J. (2013). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998-2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126-138.doi:10.1177/-0016986210397831.

Department of Education and Training. (2004). policy and implementation strategis for the education of gifted and talented student. State of NSW, Department of Education and Training, Curriculum K–12 Directorate, 2004.

Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (2000). A framework for infusing multicultural curriculum into gifted education. Roeper Review, 23, 4-10

Frederick J. Brigham and Jeffrey P. Bakken. (2014). Assessment of individuals who are gifted and talented. Gifted Education: Current Perspectives and Issues Advances in Special Education, Volume 26, 21-40.

Gagne, F. (2002). Toward a Differentiated model of giftedness and talent colangelo and G.A. Davis(Eds), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 65-80). Boston : Allyn and Bacon. Washington.

Gallagher, S. (2009). Problem-based learning.In J. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 193-210). Mansfield, CT: CreativeLearning Press.

Godinez , E.U. (2012). A correlation study of the factors that influence lifelong Chatham, S.S1992. Innovations in teaching- learning process Ed. 4VikAs publishing House pv T. LID.

Hoskins, B. Fredrikson, U. (2013). Learning to learn: What is it and can – it be measured, Joint Research Center Technical Report JRC 46532.

Hughes, C., Kettler, T., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2014). A teacher’s guide to using the Common Core State Standards in English language arts. Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.

Jacobs, H. H. & Borland, J. H. (1986). The interdisciplinary concept model: Theory and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 159-163. [See Vol. 4, p. 93.]

Jen, E. Moon. S & Samarapungavan, A. (2015). Using Design-Based Research in Gifted Education. Gifted Child Quarterly2015, Vol. 59(3) 190–200.

Kelemen, G. (2010). A personalized model design for gifted children’ education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010) 3981–3987.

Kettler, T. (2014). Critical thinking skills among elementary school students: Comparing identified gifted and general education student performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 127–136.

Kim, M. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Enrichment Programs on Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly 2016, Vol. 60(2) 102–116.

Lee, S. Y., Matthews, M. S., &Olszewski-kubilius, P. (2010). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 52 (1): (55-69).

Legg,Sh and Hutter, M.N. (2007). A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence.arXiv:0706.-3639v1 [cs.AI] 25 Jun 2007 Technical Report IDSIA-07-07.

Lewis, J., & Hafer, C. (2007). The challenges of being gifted in a rural community. Digest of Gifted Research, Duke Talent Identification Program. Retrieved from https://tip.duke.-edu/ node/842.

Lincoln, S.Y, Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.

Maker, J. (1982). Authentic assessment of problem solving and giftedness in secondary school students. Journal of secondary gifted education, 6, 19-29.

Maker, J. C. (1986). Developing a scope and sequence in curriculum. Gifted Child Quarterly 30(4), 151-158. [See Vol. 4, p. 25.]xxxii Curriculum for Gifted and Talented Students FM-Tassel-Baska.qxd 10/8/03 4:52 PM Page xxxii

Marzooghi, Rahmatallah. (2016). Curriculum Typology. International Journal Enghlishlinguhstics. Vol.6,No.,2016

Matthews, M. S., Ritchotte, J. A., & McBee, M. T. (2013). Effects of schoolwide cluster grouping and within-class ability grouping on elementary school students’ academic achievement growth. High Ability Studies, 24(2), 81–97.

McCoach, D. B., Rabin, S. J. (2012). The case for a schism: Commentary on Subotnik, Olszewski-Kubilius,and Worrell (2011). Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 210–214.

Monks, F.J. & Pflinger, R. (2005). Gifted Education in 21 European Countries: Inventory and Perspective. RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN. February 2005.

Moon, S. & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). The program for academic and creative enrichment (PACE): A follow-up study 10 years later. In R. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. (pp. 375–400). Norwood.

National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (2016). A Brief History of Gifted and Talented Education.Gifted Education in the U.S.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2015). Talent searches and accelerated programming for gifted students. In S. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Shoplik (Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (pp. 111-122). Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development,University of Iowa.

Osborn, J. B. (2014). Gifted Children: Are Their Gifts Being Identified, Encourage, or Ignored? /retrieved, 2014, from http://www.-aboutourkids.org/articles/

Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley

Plunkett, M.; Kronborg, L. (2011). Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1&2), 31-46

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Curriculum compacting: An easy start to differentiating for high-potential students. In F.A Karnes, & K.R. Stephens (Eds.), the practical strategies series in gifted education.Waco, TX: Prufrock.p, 5.

Renzulli, J. S. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(3), 298-309. [See Vol. 4, p. 115.]

Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159.

Renzulli, J. S., & Callahan, C. M. (2008). Product assessment. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students (pp. 203-225). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2012). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A focus on student creative productivity, strengths, and interests. In C. M. Callahan & H. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 199-211). New York, NY: Routledge.

Rogers, K. B. (2014). The academic, socialization, and psychological effects of acceleration: Research synthesis. A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that holdback America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 19-29). Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.

Schaeffer, K. (2015). Grouping theGifted. A Treatise Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree, Dallas Baptist University. June 2015.

Smutney, Joan F. (2004). Differentiated instruction for young gifted children. How parents can help, parenting for high potential, (step) 6-11.

Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices, and outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology, 20 (2), 6-18.

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Cognitive Psychology: Thomson ,Wadsworth. 2006. 4th ed

Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J., & Crowe, E. (2013). What are the value added contributions of selective secondary schools of mathematics, science, and technology? Talent Development & Excellence, 5(1), 87-97.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Differentiation for Gifted and Talented Students. London: Sage. 134.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2014). Curriculum issues: Artful inquiry—the use of questions in working with the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 37(1), 48–50.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2016). Higher order thinking in gifted education.In J. Baer & A. Kauffman (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 92-113). New York,NY: Cambridge University Press.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Hubbard, G. (2016). Serving the rural gifted child through advanced curriculum: A challenge of geography. In T. Stambaugh& S. Woods (Eds.), Serving gifted students in rural settings (pp. 155-177). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Coxen, S. (2016). A tribute to Richard Paul.Roeper Review, 38, 6-8. 310 Journal of Advanced Academics 27(4).

Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Williams & Wilkinds, Baltimore, 4 edition.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Willis, M. (2012). Acceleration: It’s elementary. Parenting for High Potential, 1(7), 14–15.

Xiang, Y., Dahlin, M., Cronin, J., Theaker, R., & Durant, S. (2011). Do high flyers maintain their altitude? Performance trends of top students. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute

yainos, D. and Kyritsi, A. (2011). Greek talented students’ motivation: A qualitative analysis. Gifted and Talented International, 26 (1&2), 131-142.

Zhang, H. Zhang, X. He, YandShi, J. (2017). Clustering Strategy in Intellectually Gifted Children: Assessment Using a Collaborative Recall Task. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2017, Vol. 61(2) 133–142.