مقایسه اثربخشی روش معلم‌محور با روش‌های تدریس فعال در آموزش از راه دور بر اختلالات یادگیری دانش‌آموزان

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجو دکتری علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

10.30473/etl.2025.69554.4103

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی مقایسه تاثیر روش معلم‌محور با روش‌های تدریس فعال در آموزش مجازی بر اختلالات یادگیری دانش‌آموزان با اختلالات یادگیری بود.

روش تحقیق از نوع نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون با دو گروه با پروتکل‌های متفاوت بوده و جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی تاجیکستان بودند که براساس روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس با روش انتساب تصادفی تعداد 60 نفر از دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند که در دو گروه آزمایشی متفاوت (30 نفر در گروه روش معلم‌محور و 30 نفر در گروه روش تدریس فعال) انتساب تصادفی تقسیم گردید. ابزار پژوهش شامل پروتکل‌های محقق‌ساخته آموزشی معلم‌محور و روش تدریس فعال و یک پرسش‌نامۀ محقق‌ساخته اختلالات یادگیری با 30 گویه و 3 مولفه با پایایی 84/0 بود که روایی محتوایی پرسش‌نامه محقق‌ساخته توسط چند متخصص مربوطه و روایی صوری توسط متخصصان این حوزه تایید شد. در این پژوهش با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS24 تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و استنباطی از روش آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس انجام شده است.

نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت معنادار بین دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی تاجیکستانی در اختلال ریاضی (507/0) مبتنی بر روش معلم‌محور و روش تدریس فعال وجود نداشت. تفاوت معنادار بین دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی تاجیکستانی در اختلال خواندن (010/0) و نوشتن (0001/0) مبتنی بر روش معلم‌محور و روش تدریس فعال وجود داشت و نمرات روش تدریس فعال بهتر بود.

روش معلم‌محور با روش‌های تدریس فعال در آموزش از راه دور بر اختلالات یادگیری (خواندن و نوشتن) دانش‌آموزان موثر بوده است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing the Effect of Teacher-Centered and Active Teaching Methods in Distance Education on Students' Learning Disorders

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nasim Saeid 1
  • Mehran Farajollahi 2
  • Hasti Kabiri 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD. Student of Educational Scienes Payame Noor Univercity , Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present study aimed to compare the effect of teacher-centered and active teaching ‎methods in distance education on learning disorders of students with learning disorders.

This ‎study was a quasi-experimental with a pretest–posttest research design with two groups with ‎different protocols. The statistical population included all elementary school students in ‎Tajikistan, from which 60 students with learning disorders selected as the sample using the ‎convenience sampling technique and randomly assigned to two different experimental ‎groups (30 students in the teacher-centered method group and 30 students in the active-teaching method group). The research tools included researcher-made teacher-centered educational protocols, active teaching methods, and a researcher-made questionnaire on learning disorders with 30 items and 3 components, which had a reliability of 0.84. Content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by several relevant experts, and face validity was confirmed by experts in this field. In this research, data analysis was conducted using SPSS24 software at two levels: descriptive and inferential statistics, employing the analysis of covariance test method.

The results showed that there was no significant difference in math disorders (0.507) among Tajik primary school students based on teacher centered and active teaching methods. However, there was a significant difference in reading (0.010) and writing (0.0001) between the two methods, with scores being better for the active teaching method.









The teacher-centered method with active teaching methods in distance education, has been effective for students' learning disorders (reading and writing)

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Learning Disorders
  • Virtual Education
  • Active Teaching Methods
  • Teacher-Centered Method
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub. https://www.amazon.com/Diagnostic-Statistical-Manual-Mental-Disorders/dp/089042554X
Cerner, J. (2005). Learning Disorders. Translation: Dr. Esmat Danesh. Shahid beheshti university publications. https://tobreg.org/index.php/journal/-article/view/771
Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities. https://www.naset.org/publications/ld-report/the-state-of-learning-disabilities-facts-trends-and-emerging-issues
Dumitrache, A., & Almasan, B. (2014). Educative Valences of Using Educational Games in Virtual Classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142. https://10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.613
Ezurike, C. P, Ayo, V. A. F. (2020). Influence of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Teaching Methods on the Academic Achievement of Post-Basic Students in Biology in Delta State, Nigeria. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 5(3): 120-124. https://10.11648/j.tecs.20200503.21
Emadi, S.R., Mohagheghi, A. (2015). Investigating the effect of dictation educational software in eliminating dictation disorder in students in learning disorder treatment centers. Journal of Disability Studies, 5, 159-152. http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-565-fa.html
Goulème, N., Lions, C., Gérard, C.L., Peyre, H., Thai-Van, H., Bucci, M. (2018). Vertical disconjugacy during reading in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children. Neuroscience Letters, 671, https://10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.016
Habibi caliber,R, Bahadori khosroshahi, J. (2019). The effectiveness of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on social cognition, inhibitory control, and cognitive avoidance in students with mathematical learning disabilities. Quarterly Journal of Neuropsychology, 5(17), 89-108. https://Clpsy.2019.45313.1426/10.30473
Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., Deaño, M., Gil, S., & Conde, Á. (2017). Mathematical learning disabilities and attention deficit and/or hyperactivity disorder: A study of the cognitive processes involved in arithmetic problem solving. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 61, 44-54. https://10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.012
Izan, M., Ghaderi, M., Shirbagi, N. (2019). Presenting a Native Model of Teacher-Centered Educational Supervision in Elementary Schools. Modern Educational Thoughts, 15(3), 113-140. https://jontoe.alzahra.ac.ir/article_4371.html
Khaleqkhah, A., Davoodi, H., Alipour Katigari, Sh. (2016). The effectiveness of direct instruction, computer-assisted instruction, and mastery learning methods on reducing problems in students with math disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6(2), 83-99. https://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_484.html
Laleh, K., Rezaei, M.A., Kian-Erthy, F. (2017). Comparison of visual spatial ability, cognitive planning and short-term memory in students with and without writing disorder. Learning Disabilities, 6(3), 105-92. https://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_521.html
Maleki, S., Arjomandnia, A.A. (2019). The role of working memory in learning disorders: focusing on reading disorders and reviewing research in this field. Rooyesh Ravashshani (Scientific Journal), 8(3), 101-112. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-909-fa.html
Mariel A. Pfeifer, Julio J. Cordero, and Julie Dangremond Stanton. (2023). What I Wish My Instructor Knew: How Active Learning Influences the Classroom Experiences and Self-Advocacy of STEM Majors with ADHD and Specific Learning Disabilities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-12-0329
Movahedzadeh, B., Badiad, A. (2018). Comparing the effects of new and traditional teaching methods on the learning rate of students with learning disabilities. Fourth National Congress of Recent Findings in the Humanities. https://civilica.com/doc/925894
Mahghani Jamaluddin, S., Janabadi, Hossein. (2019). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies training on the motivation for academic achievement of students with learning disabilities. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 7(12), 1.15. 10.22084/j.psychogy.2019.17931.1871
Nosrati, F., Ghobari Bonab, B., Vakili Nejad, M., Keshavarz, A.H. (2016). The effectiveness of direct instruction on the mathematical performance of students with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5(4 (19th issue), 108-122. https://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_435.html
Nikraftar, M., Nikbin, N. (1403). Effective interventions in improving attention and working memory of dyslexic students. National Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran, https://www.sid.ir/paper/1145462/fa
Saif Ghaleb, B. D. (2024). Effect of Exam-Focused and Teacher-Centered Education Systems on Students' Cognitive and Psychological Competencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 2: 611-631. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v2i02.648
Serin, Hamdi (2018) A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5 (1). pp. 164-167. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164
Sharifi-Jandani, H.R., Miriari, S., Abbasi, Bita. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness of theater therapy on improving social competence of students with specific learning disabilities in mathematics. Learning Disabilities, 7(4), 104-87 https://jld.uma.ac.ir/article_683.html
Woods, P J, Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138: 104415. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X23004031
Zerati Idelou, R.,Zargham, M., Kamkari, K. (2019). The effectiveness of the third level of response to intervention (TIRE3) on improving the mathematical performance of students with mathematical disorders. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Psychological Methods and Models, 10(36), 49-66. https://jpmm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_3604.html
Yarmohammadian, A. (2013). Analysis of the relationship between learning disabilities and language disorders in elementary school students. Journal of Rehabilitation, 14 (1), 23. http://rehabilitationj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-731-fa.htm