با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن روانشناسی تربیتی ایران

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد، سنجش و اندازه‌گیری (روان‌سنجی)، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 دانشیار، گروه سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

این پژوهش به منظور تعیین روابط سببی متغیرهایی که بیشترین اثر را بر روی خودناتوان‌سازی تحصیلی در دانشجویان شهر تهران داشتند، صورت گرفته ‌است. جامعۀ آماری همۀ دانشجویان شهر تهران بودند که از بین آنان تعداد 520 نفر از چهار دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، آزاد اسلامی مرکز تهران جنوب و پیام نور واحد تهران جنوب به روش داوطلبانه به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسش‌نامه‌های فرم کوتاهشخصیتی NEO، کمال‌گرایی چندبعدی، خودکارآمدی عمومی‌، انگیزش تحصیلی، خودناتوان‌سازی و عزت نفس بود. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، حمایت‌کننده برازش مدل با داده‌ها و روابط ساختاری مفروض است و در مجموع نشان می‌دهد که ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، کمال‌گرایی، عزت نفس، عملکرد تحصیلی و انگیزش تحصیلی به طور مستقیم و خودکارآمدی به طور غیر مستقیم و با میانجی‌گری عملکرد تحصیلی،خودناتوان‌سازی تحصیلی را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهند. همچنین ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و کمال‌گرایی به طور غیر مستقیم نیز از طریق میانجی‌گری عملکرد تحصیلی و انگیزش تحصیلی بر خودناتوان‌سازی تحصیلی اثر می‌گذارند. با افزایش روان‌رنجورخویی و کاهش گشودگی، خودناتوان‌سازی تحصیلی احتمال بروز پیدا می‌کندو همچنین عزت نفس، خودکارآمدی و انگیزش تحصیلی بالا موجب پایین ‌آمدن میزان خودناتوان‌سازی می‌گردد اما میزان بالای کمال‌گرایی و عملکرد تحصیلی احتمال بروز رفتارهای خودناتوان‌ساز را افزایش می‌دهد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explanation of Academic Self-Handicapping Based on Effective Factors: Examination of a Comprehensive Conceptual Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammad seidsalehi 1
  • noorali farrokhi 2

چکیده [English]

This research was conducted to determine the causal relationships of variables that have most effect on academic self-handicapping in the university students of Tehran. The population was the university students of Tehran that 520 people were selected as a sample from the universities of Allameh Tabataba’i, Tehran, south branch of Payam-e-Noor & Islamic Azad through voluntary sampling. The research tools was include the short form of NEO Personality inventory, perfectionism Multidimensional Questionnaire, General self-efficacy Questionnaire, classroom motivational scale, academic self-handicapping Questionnaire, self-esteem Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using structural equations modeling. The findings provided a robust support for the hypothesized structural relationships and show that personality traits, perfectionism, self-esteem, academic performance and academic motivation could directly affect academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy could indirectly affect academic self-handicapping with the mediating effects of academic performance. Also personality traits and perfectionism could indirectly affect academic self-handicapping with the mediating effects of academic performance and academic motivation. With the increase in neuroticism and by reducing the openness experience, academic self-handicapping will probably emerge and also high level of self-esteem, self-efficacy and academic motivation Will lead to lower levels of academic self-handicapping but high level of perfectionism and academic performance Increases the academic self-handicapping behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic Motivation
  • Academic Performance
  • Academic Self-Handicapping
  • Perfectionism
  • personality traits
  • Self - Efficacy
  • Self - Esteem
Antony, J. (2016). Academic Self-Efficacy and Self-Handicapping: Are they Influenced by Self-Regulated Learning?. Journal of Research: THE BEDE ATHENAEUM, 7(1), 15-22.
Berglas, S. & Jones, E.E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36(4), 405.
Bobo, J.L.; Whitaker, K.C. & Strunk, K.K. (2013). Personality and student self-handicapping: A cross-validated regression approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 619-621.
Bong, M.; Hwang, A.; Noh, A. & Kim, S.I. (2014). Perfectionism and motivation of adolescents in academic contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 711.
Brown, T.A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
Byrne, B.M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
Chang, Y.P. (2010). A Study of EFL college students’ self-handicapping and English performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2006-2010.
Chen, H.R. & Tseng, H.F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and program planning, 35(3), 398-406.
Clarke, I.E. & MacCann, C. (2016a). Internal and external aspects of self-handicapping reflect the distinction between motivations and behaviours: Evidence from the Self-handicapping Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 6-11.
Clarke, I.E. & MacCann, C. (2016b). What is self-handicapping?. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 472.
Coudevylle, G.R.; Gernigon, C. & Martin Ginis, K.A. (2011). Self-esteem, self-confidence, anxiety and claimed self-handicapping: A mediational analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 670-675.
Covington, M.V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and imprecations. Elementary school Journal. 85(1), 5-20.
Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wong, M.M.H. (2014). Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. In Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 437-465). Springer Netherlands.
De Feyter, T.; Caers, R.; Vigna, C. & Berings, D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 439-448.
Del Mar Ferradás, M.; Freire, C.; Núñez, J.C.; Piñeiro, I. & Rosário, P. (2016). Motivational profiles in university students. Its relationship with self-handicapping and defensive pessimism strategies. Learning and Individual Differences. Volume 27, Pages 134-143
Di Giunta, L.; Alessandri, G.; Gerbino, M.; Kanacri, P.L.; Zuffiano, A. & Caprara, G.V. (2013). The determinants of scholastic achievement: The contribution of personality traits, self-esteem, and academic self-efficacy. Learning and individual Differences, 27, 102-108.
Eyink, J.; Hirt, E.R.; Hendrix, K.S. & Galante, E. (2017). Circadian variations in claimed self-handicapping: Exploring the strategic use of stress as an excuse. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 102-110.
Firoozi, M.; Zadebagheri, G.; Kazemi, A. & Karami, M. (2016). An investigation on the relationship between perfectionism beliefs, self-efficacy, and test anxiety with self-handicapping behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 94-98.
Fletcher, K.L. & Speirs Neumeister, K.L. (2012). Research on perfectionism and achievement motivation: Implications for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 668-677.
Galla, B.M.; Wood, J.J.; Tsukayama, E.; Har, K.; Chiu, A.W. & Langer, D.A. (2014). A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance. Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 295-308.
Gravetter, F.J. & Forzano, L.A.B. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Nelson Education.
Hobden, K. & Pliner, P. (1995). Self-handicapping and dimensions of perfectionism: Self-presentation vs self-protection. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(4), 461-474.
Honicke, T. & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84.
Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Knee, C.R. & Zuckerman, M. (1998). A nondefensive personality: Autonomy and control as moderators of defensive coping and self-handicapping. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 115-130.
Litvinova, A.; Balarabe, M. & Mohammed, A.I. (2015). Influence of Personality Traits and Age on Academic Self-Handicapping among Undergraduate Students of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. Psychology, 6(15), 1995.
Mamaril, N.A.; Usher, E.L. & Coyle, B.A. (2013). Academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy as predictors of mathematics achievement of African American middle school students. P20 Motivation and Learning Lab, University of Kentucky, College of Education, Kentucky, USA.
Martin V.C. (2000) Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An Integrative Review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200
Metsäpelto, R.L.; Pakarinen, E.; Kiuru, N.; Poikkeus, A.M.; Lerkkanen, M.K. & Nurmi, J.E. (2015). Developmental dynamics between children’s externalizing problems, task-avoidant behavior, and academic performance in early school years: A 4-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 246.
Midgley, C.; Kaplan, A. & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77.
Nosenko, D.; Arshava, I. & Nosenko, E. (2014). Self-handicapping as a coping strategy: approaches to conceptualization. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(3), 166.
Ommundsen, Y. (2001). Self-handicapping strategies in physical education classes: The influence of implicit theories of the nature of ability and achievement goal orientations. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2(3), 139-156.
Rappo, G.; Alesi, M. & Pepi, A. (2016). The effects of school anxiety on self-esteem and self-handicapping in pupils attending primary school. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1-12.
Richards, H.D.B.; Johnson, G.; Collins, D.J. & Wood, J.E. (2002). Predictive ability of self-handicapping and self-esteem in physical activity achievement context. Personality and individual differences, 32(4), 589-602.
Rickert, N.P.; Meras, I.L. & Witkow, M.R. (2014). Theories of intelligence and students' daily self-handicapping behaviors. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 1-8.
Snyder, K.E.; Malin, J.L.; Dent, A.L. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The message matters: The role of implicit beliefs about giftedness and failure experiences in academic self-handicapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 230.
Stewart, M.A. & De George-Walker, L. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and self-efficacy: A path model. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 160-164.
Tabachnick, B. & Fidel, L. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education
Török, L.; Szabó, Z.P. & Boda - Ujlaky, J. (2014). Self-esteem, self - conscious emotions, resilience, trait anxiety and their relation to self-handicapping tendencies. Review of Psychology, 21(2), 123-130.
Uysal, A. & Lu, Q. (2010). Self-handicapping and pain catastrophizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 502-505.
Virtanen, T.E.; Kiuru, N.; Lerkkanen, M.K.; Poikkeus, A.M. & Kuorelahti, M. (2016). Assessment of student engagement among junior high school students and associations with self-esteem, burnout, and academic achievement. Journal for Educational Research Online/Journal für Bildungsfor-schung Online, 8(2), 136-157.
Want, J. & Kleitman, S. (2006). Imposter phenomenon and self-handicapping: Links with parenting styles and self-confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 961-971.
Wusik, M.F. & Axsom, D. (2016). Socially Positive Behaviors as Self-Handicapping. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 35(6), 494-509.