اعتباریابی الگوی پارادایمی توسعه حرفه‌ای پایدار معلمان

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران .

2 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش اعتباریابی الگوی پارادایمی توسعه حرفه‌ای پایدار معلمان بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از حیث روش آمیخته اکتشافی متوالی بود. مرحله کیفی مبتنی بر رویکرد نظریه داده بنیاد بود. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از کدگذاری باز، محوری و گزینشی و مکس کیودا (2020) استفاده شد. در مرحله کمی، جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه معلمان ابتدایی مدارس استان اردبیل به تعداد 5009 نفر بود که تعداد 360 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسش‌نامه محققساخته بود. برای بررسی معناداری روابط متغیر‌ها از مدل حداقل مربعات جزئی، روایی همگرا، واگرا، آلفای کرونباخ، پایایی ترکیبی، spss و smart pls 4 استفاده شد.
نتایج نشان داد که ضرایب مسیر بین متغیر‌های‌ پنهان و سازه‌های اصلی بالاتر از 7/0 و بارهای عاملی بین متغیرهای پنهان و آشکار بالاتر از 5/0 است، همچنین مقادیر p-values کمتر از 05/0 و آماره t بالاتر از 96/1 بود، بنابراین روابط متغیرهای پنهان و آشکار با سازه‌های اصلی معنادار است. همچنین مقادیر واریانس استخراج شده (AVE)، بالاتر از 5/0 و مقادیر شاخص یگانه-دوگانه ((HTMT کمتر از 9/0 بود و گویه‌های متغیرها دارای همبستگی درونی و روایی افتراقی مناسب بودند.
می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که نتایج حاصل از مرحله کمی، مدل پارادایمی حاصل از مرحله کیفی پژوهش را تایید می‌کند و این مدل از اعتبار مناسبی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation the paradigmatic model of teachers’ sustainable professional development

نویسندگان [English]

  • Michael Ahadpour 1
  • Taghi Akbari 2
  • Husein Tagavi 2
  • Adel ZahedBabelan 2
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of this research was Validation the paradigmatic model of teachers’ sustainable professional development.
This research was applied in terms of purpose and mixed method, sequential exploratory.The qualitative stage was based on a grounded theory approach. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. Open, axial, and selective coding and maxqda (2020) were used to analyze the data. In the quantitative stage, The statistical population of the study was all elementary school teachers in schools in Ardabil province, 5009 people, of whom 360 people were selected using a multi-stage cluster sampling method. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire.To examine the significance of the relationships between the variables, partial least squares model, convergent and divergent validity, Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, SPSS and Smart PLS 4 were used.
The results showed that the path coefficients between latent variables and main constructs were higher than 0.7 and the factor loadings between latent and observered variables were higher than 0.5, also the p-values were lower than 0.05 and the t-statistic was higher than 1.96, so the relationships between latent and observered variables with the main constructs were significant. Also, the average variance extracted (AVE) values were higher than 0.5 and the heterotrait-monotrait ratio values (HTMT) were lower than 0.9 and the variable items had appropriate internal correlation and discriminant validity. It can be concluded that the results from the quantitative stage confirm the paradigm model obtained from the qualitative stage of the research and this model has appropriate validity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable professional development
  • continuous
  • effectiveness
  • Sustainable impact
  • paradigmatic model
Ajani, O. A. (2019). Understanding teachers as adult learners in professional development activities for enhanced classroom practices. Affrika; London, 9(2), 195–208. http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter
Abdullahi, B. & Safari, A. (2015). a review of the basic obstacles to the professional growth of teachers. Educational Innovations, 15(2), 99-134. ]in persian[
Anyolo, E. O., Karkkainen, S. & Keinonen, T. (2018). Implementing education for sustainable development in Namibia: School teachers perceptions and teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 64-81. DOI:10.2478/jtes-2018-0004
Bendtsen, M., Forsman, L. & Björklund, M. (2022). Exploring empowering practices for teachers’ sustainable continuing professional development. Educational Research, 64(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.2000338
Bunning, F., Spottl, G., H. & Stolte, H. (2022). Technical and vocational teacher education and training in international and development co-operation: Models, approaches and trends. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6474-8
Blömeke, S., & Olsen, R. V. (2019). Consistency of Results Regarding Teacher Effects Across Subjects, School Levels, Outcomes and Countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.018.
Choi, J., & Kang, W. (2019). Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy. Sustainability, 1-14. doi:10.3390/su11030585
Didion, L., Toste, J. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: A meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 29–66. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 19345 747. 2019. 16708 84
Dahl, T. (2019). Prepared to Teach for Sustainable Development? Student Teachers’ Beliefs in Their Ability to Teach for Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainability, 1-10. doi:10.3390/su11071993
Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining Teaching Quality Around the World. European Journal of Teacher Education 44 (3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Efective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. 1-64.
Everett, L. (2024). Deep learning in teacher professional development using Goethean phenomenology: a self-study. Professional Development in Education, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2024.2371865
Foster M. M. & Foster, D. (2023). Advancing Sustainable Development Through Teacher Professional Development. In book: Agricultural Education for Development in the Arab Countries, 230-254.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4050-6.ch009
Fütterer, T., Hübner, N., Fischer, C., & Stürmer, K. (2024). Heading for new shores? Longitudinal participation patterns in teacher professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2370891
Ganser, T. (2000). An ambitious vision of professional development for teachers. Nassp Bulletin, 84(618), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461802
Gamlem, S. M. & Helleve, I. (2022). Mapping sustainability of professional development in four Norwegian lower-secondary schools. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2117518. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2117518
He, p., Guo, F. & and Anulika Abazie, G. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(63), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0
Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2015). School leaders as participants in teachers’ professional development: The impact on teachers’ and school leaders’ professional growth. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12). https:// doi. org/ 10. 14221/ ajte. 2015v 40n12.8
Herrmann, M., Clark, M., James-Burdumy, S., Tuttle, C., Kautz, T., Knechtel, V., Dotter, D., Wulsin, C. S., and Deke, J. (2019). The Effects of a Principal Professional Development Program Focused on Instructional Leadership (NCEE 2020–0002).
Hauge, K. (2019).  Teachers’ collective professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1619223
Irnidayanti, Y., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Fadhilah, N. (2020). Relationship between teaching motivation and teaching behaviour of secondary education teachers in Indonesia (Relaci_on entre la motivaci_on docente y el comportamiento docente en profesores de educaci_on secundaria en Indonesia). Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia y Aprendizaje, 43(2), 271–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1722413
Knowles J.G., Kelley T. R., Holland J. D. (2018). Increasing teacher awareness of STEM careers. J STEM Educ Innov Res, 19(3),47–55.
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research 88 (4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Kowalski, S. M., Taylor, J. A., Askinas, K. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Maddix, W. P., & Tipton, E. (2020). Examining factors contributing to variation in effect size estimates of teacher outcomes from studies of science teacher professional development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 430–458. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 19345 747. 2020. 17265 38
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Grootenboer, P. & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Kopsen, S., & Andersson, P. (2017). Reformation of VET and demands on teachers’ subject knowledge–Swedish vocational teachers’ recurrent participation in a national CPD initiative. Journal of Education and Work, 30(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1119259
Khorasani, M., Noorollahi M., Mehri, D., H. Naqshbandi, H., & Namdar, H. (2014). Identification of factors affecting the transfer of education to the work environment in Air University Shahid Sattari. Human Resources Studies, 5(1), 137-162. ] in persian[
Khoroshi, P. (2015). Strategies for professional development of teachers in developed countries with emphasis on the necessity of paying attention to it in Farhangian University. Quarterly Journal of Fakor Teacher Education, 1(1), 53-66.]in Persian[
Liu, S., & Phelps, G. (2020). Does Teacher Learning Last? Understanding How Much Teachers Retain Their Knowledge After Professional Development. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 537–550. DOI:10.1177/0022487119886290
Li, D., Bliss, L., Henderson, L. & Clark, P. (2024). Professional development through collaborative action research for early career academics - a collaborative auto-ethnography during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Action Research, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2024.2333911
Meesuk, P., Wongrugsa, A. & Wangkaewhiran, T. (2021). Sustainable Teacher Professional Development Through Professional Learning Community: PLC. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 30-44. DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2021-0015
Mazhar, M. & Sylva, K. (2025). Developing a Low-Resource, Evidence-Based Early Years Professional Development Programme Using Self-Assessment. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01863-5
Manal, R., Mohamed, D. &  Fatima-Zahra, G. (2024). A Teachers’ Coaching Approach to Sustainable Professional Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 26(1), 63–80. DOI:10.2478/jtes-2024-000
McChesney, K., Gurney, L., & Chivers, M. (2024).Teacher Professional Learning and Development Research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Scoping Review of Literature, 2010–2023. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 59, 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00335-5
McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. (2021). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. doi:10.1080/ 19415257.2019.1667412
Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher pro­fessional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291–307. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021
Ministry of Education, (2010). theoretical foundation of the fundamental transformation in the formal education system of the Islamic Republic of Iran Education, Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution and Supreme Council of Education. ] in persian[
Nguyen, T. D., & Redding, C. (2018). Changes in the demographics, qualifications, and turnover of American STEM teachers, 1988–2012. 4(3), 1–13. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 23328 58418 802790
Olatunde-Aiyedun, T. G. & Ogunode, N. J. (2021). School administration and effective teaching methods in science education in Nigeria. International Journal on Integrated Education, 4(2), 145- 161. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.11502.54080
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results. Teachers and School Leaders As Lifelong Learners (Volume I). TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en .
 Oliveira, S., Roberto, M. S., Veiga-Simao, A. M., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2021). A meta-analysis of the impact of social and emotional learning interventions on teachers’ burnout symptoms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1779–1808. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10648- 021- 09612-x
 Permyakov A. V., Petryakov, P. A., Shirin, A. G. & Tsyvunina, A. D. (2024). Professional and personal development of newly-qualified teachers as a factor in sustainable development of the region. Science for Education Today, 14(5), 158-180. DOI:10.15293/2658-6762.2405.08
Pianta, R. C. (2011). Teaching children well: New evidence based approaches to teacher professional development and training. Center for American Progress, 11, 1–36.
Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, W., Ives, A., S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.006
Parker, M., Ficklin, K., & Mishra, M. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy in a rural K-5 Setting: Quantitative research on the influence of engineering professional development. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(4), 704–729.
Pluye, P., Potvin, L., Denis, J. L., Pelletier, J.(2004). Program sustainability: focus on organizational routines. Health Promotion International, 19(4), 489-500. doi:10.1093/heapro/dah411
Padillo, G.G., Manguilimotan R. P., Capuno, R. G. & Espina R. C. ( 2021). Professional Development Activities And Teacher Performance. International Journal Of Education and Practice, 9(3), 497-506. DOI:10.18488/journal.61.2021.93.497.506
Rodriguez-Gomez, D., José Luís, M. M. & Georgeta, I. (2024). Empowering Teachers: Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Sustainable Professional Development in Initial Teacher Education at Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 16(7), 3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073021
Suryati, L., Ambiyar, A., Ahyanuardi, A., Efronia, Y., & Rahmadhani, S. (2024). The urgency of increasing teacher vocational competence in the era of society .5.0. Edumaspul: Journal Pendidikan, 7(2), 6017–6031. doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7588
Song, X., et al. (2022). The relationship between teacher’s gender and deep learning strategy: the mediating role of deep learning motivation. Psychology in the schools, 59 (11), 2251–2266. doi:10.1002/pits.22694  
Sajadi, S. M. T., M. Kian M. & Safai Movahed, S. (2013). Pathology of the phenomenon of transfer of education in in-service training of education and training organization (a case study of Khorasan Province Razavi). Education and Development of Human Resources, 1(2), 1-24. ] in persian[
Shah Mohammadi, N. (2014). Teachers of the 21st century: Qualifications and competencies of teachers in the Philippines. Teacher development, 40-43. ] in persian[
Scheirer, M. A. & Dearing, J. W. (2011). An Agenda for Research on the Sustainability of Public Health Programs. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2059-2067.
 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M.  (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage
Ufnar, J. A., & Shepherd, V. L. (2019). The Scientist in the classroom partnership program: An innovative teacher professional development model. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 642–658. https:// doi. org/10. 1080/ 19415 257. 2018. 14744 87
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for profes­sional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001Get and content.
Whitworth, B. A. & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional Development and Teacher Change: The Missing Leadership Link. Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10972-014-9411-2 .
Wu, X. E.,  Bautista, A., & Lee, K. (2025). Impact of Online Professional Development (PD) on Kindergarten Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Regarding Teacher-Child Interactions. Early Childhood Education Journal. DOI:10.1007/s10643-025-01906-x
Yang, H. (2020). The effects of professional development experience on teacher self-efficacy. Professional development in education, 46 (5), 797–811. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1643393.
 Yang, X., & Yuan-Cheng, C. (2024). The Effects of Perceived Distributed Leadership on Teacher Professional Development among Primary School Teachers: The Mediating Role of Teacher Professional Learning Community. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202429304
Zhang, C. (2022). A Forward-Looking Study on the In-Depth Development Planning of Information Technology into Teacher Education. Journal of Sensors, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4885771
Zeng, J. (2023). A theoretical review of the role of teacher professional development in EFL students’ learning achievement. Heliyon, 9(5), e15806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15806
Zhou, X., Shu, S., Xu, Z., & Padron, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in‑service STEM teachers’ self‑efficacy: a meta‑analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10 (37), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x