مدل‌یابی درگیری تحصیلی بر پایه هویت تحصیلی موفق، سرزندگی و خودراهبری با نقش میانجی اشتیاق تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دختر

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی تربیتی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سمنان، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه آموزش روان‌شناسی و مشاوره، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665 تهران. ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665 تهران. ایران.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، مدل‌یابی درگیری تحصیلی بر پایه هویت تحصیلی موفق، سرزندگی و خودراهبری با نقش میانجی اشتیاق تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دختر بود. این پژوهش از نوع همبستگی و با رویکرد مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل ۵۵۰ نفر از دانش‌آموزان دختر مقطع متوسطه دوم شهرستان دامغان در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۳-۱۴۰۴ بود که از میان آن‌ها ۲۲۶ نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شد. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسش‌نامه سرزندگی تحصیلی مارتین و مارش (2006)، اشتیاق تحصیلی فردریکز، بلومنفیلد و پاریس (2004)، هویت تحصیلی واز و ایزاکسون (2008)، درگیری تحصیلی آپلتون، کریستنسون، کیم و رچلی (2006) و خودراهبری فویشر و کینگ (2010) بود و تحلیل داده‌ها با نرم‌افزار Smart-PLS-3 انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که هویت تحصیلی موفق (03/8=t، 37/0=β)، سرزندگی تحصیلی (66/3=t، 16/0=β) و خودراهبری (73/5=t، 27/0=β) تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر درگیری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان دارند. همچنین، هویت تحصیلی موفق (27/5=t، 30/0=β)، سرزندگی تحصیلی (61/7=t، 37/0=β) و خودراهبری (36/5=t، 28/0=β) بر اشتیاق تحصیلی اثر مثبت و معناداری داشتند و اشتیاق تحصیلی نیز بر درگیری تحصیلی اثر مثبت داشت (30/5=t، 26/0=β). افزون بر این، اشتیاق تحصیلی در رابطه بین هویت تحصیلی موفق و درگیری تحصیلی (35/3=t، 08/0=β)، سرزندگی تحصیلی و درگیری تحصیلی (77/3=t، 10/0=β) و نیز خودراهبری و درگیری تحصیلی (74/3=t، 07/0=β) نقش میانجی معناداری ایفا کرد. نتایج شاخص‌های R² و Q² نشان داد که مدل از قدرت تبیین و پیش‌بینی مطلوبی برخوردار است. همچنین، هویت تحصیلی موفق و خودراهبری بیشترین نقش را در تبیین درگیری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان داشته و اثر آن‌ها در حد متوسط تا قوی بود. معلمان، مشاوران و مدیران مدارس باید با ایجاد محیطی حمایتی، تقویت احساس تعلق و آموزش مهارت‌های خودراهبری، زمینه افزایش اشتیاق و مشارکت فعال دانش‌آموزان در فرایند یادگیری را فراهم کنند. توجه به این عوامل می‌تواند در کاهش افت تحصیلی، افزایش انگیزه و بهبود کیفیت یادگیری دانش‌آموزان دختر نقش مؤثری داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling Academic Engagement Based on Successful Academic Identity, Vitality, and Self-Directed Learning Considering the Mediating Role of Academic Enthusiasm among Female Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali rezae miremadi 1
  • Noormohammad Rezaei 2
  • Karim Shateri 3
1 Ms.C. Student, Department of Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Counseling, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889. Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Administration, Farhangian University, P.O. Box 14665-889, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of the present study was to model academic engagement based on successful academic identity, academic vitality, and self-directed learning with the mediating role of academic enthusiasm among female students. This study was correlational in nature and conducted using structural equation modeling. The statistical population included 550 female students of senior secondary schools in Damghan during the academic year 2024–2025, of whom 226 students selected through convenience sampling. The data collection instruments included the Academic Vitality Questionnaire by Martin and Marsh (2006), the Academic Enthusiasm Questionnaire by Fredricks, Blumenfeld and Paris (2004), the Academic Identity Questionnaire by Vaz and Isaacson (2008), the Academic Engagement Questionnaire by Appleton, Christenson, Kim and Reschly (2006), and the Self-Directed Learning Questionnaire by Fisher and King (2010). Data analyzed using Smart-PLS-3 software. The results showed that successful academic identity (β=0.37, t=8.03), academic vitality (β=0.16, t=3.66), and self-directed learning (β=0.27, t=5.73) had a positive and significant effect on students’ academic engagement. Also, successful academic identity (β=0.30, t=5.27), academic vitality (β=0.37, t=7.61), and self-directed learning (β=0.28, t=5.36) had a positive and significant effect on academic enthusiasm, and academic enthusiasm also had a positive effect on academic engagement (β=0.26, t=5.30). Furthermore, academic enthusiasm played a significant mediating role in the relationship between successful academic identity and academic engagement (β=0.08, t=3.35), academic vitality and academic engagement (β=0.10, t=3.77), and self-directed learning and academic engagement (β=0.07, t=3.74). The R² and Q² indices showed that the model had acceptable explanatory and predictive power. Also, successful academic identity and self-directed learning had the greatest role in explaining academic engagement, with moderate to strong effects. Teachers, counselors, and school administrators should create a supportive environment, strengthen students’ sense of belonging, and teach self-directed learning skills to increase students’ enthusiasm and active participation in the learning process. Attention to these factors can play an important role in reducing academic failure, increasing motivation, and improving the quality of learning among female students

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Successful Academic Identity
  • Academic Vitality
  • Self-Directed Learning
  • Academic Enthusiasm
  • Students' Academic Engagement
Abdi, A., & Sheikhi Somar, H. (2019). Investigating the relationship between readiness for self-directed learning and academic engagement in junior high school students. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Recent Innovations in Psychology, Applications, and Empowerment with a focus on Psychotherapy. Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/922275/ [In Persian]
Acosta-Gonzaga, E. (2023). The effects of self-esteem and academic engagement on university students' performance. Behav. Sci. 13:348. doi: 10.3390/bs13040348
Al-Alwan, A. F. (2014). Modeling the relations among parental involvement, school engagement, and academic performance of high school students. Journal Name.
Amorin, R. B., & Orbino, H. C. (2025). Enhancing self-directed learning, academic self-efficacy, and student performance in modular distance learning. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 21(1).
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Kim, D. and Reschly, A.L. (2006) Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
Babolsalam, S., Ghazanfari, A., & Ahmadi, R. (2022). Modeling academic engagement based on academic identity with the mediating role of student academic well-being. Child Mental Health Quarterly, 9(3), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.52547/jcmh.9.3.6 [in Persian]
Bordbar, S., Mirzaei, S., Bahmaei, J., Atashbahar, O., & Yusefi, A. R. (2025). Predicting students’ academic performance based on academic identity, academic excitement, and academic enthusiasm. BMC Medical Education, 25, Article 768. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07374-6
Capon-Sieber V, Köhler C, Alp Christ A, Helbling J and Praetorius A-K. (2022). The Role of Relatedness in the Motivation and Vitality of University Students in Online Classes During Social Distancing. Front. Psychol. 12:702323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702323
Chen, C. F. (1998). Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(2), 59–65.
Ching, M. M. (2021). Academic identity and student motivation: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Closson, L.M., & Boutilier, R.R. (2018). Perfectionism, academic engagement, and procrastination among undergraduates: The moderating role of honors student status. Learning and Individual Differences. 57, 157-162
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, E. B., & Cooper, C. S. (1985). Clinician attitudes toward stuttering: A decade of change (1973–1983). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(85)90003-8
Coros, J. D., & Madrigal, D. V. (2021). Self-Directed Learning, Self-Efficacy in Learning, and Academic Motivation of Public Senior High School Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 21(2), 19–34.
Dehghanizadeh, M. H., & Hossein-Chari, M. (2012). Academic vitality and perception of family communication patterns: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Studies in Education and Learning, 4(2), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2013.1575 [in Persian]
Esmailzadeh Ashini, M., Garavand, Y., Mansouri Kriyani, R., & Hajiyakhchali, A. (2020). Comparing the causal model of the relationship between vitality and academic engagement with the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in male and female high school students. New Thoughts in Education, 15(4), 251–282. https://doi.org/10.22051/jontoe.2020.23744.2473 [in Persian]
Esmaili, L., Sohrabi, N., Mehryar, A. H., & Kheir, M. (2020). The causal model of learning strategies (cognitive and metacognitive) mediated by academic hope for academic self-efficacy in high school students. Scientific Quarterly of Psychological Methods and Models, 11(41), 17–34. [in Persian]
Fakharian, J., Yaghoobi, A., Zargham Hajebi, M. and Mohagheghi, H. (2020). Predicting Academic vitality based on Family Emotional Climate, Academic Engagement, and Academic Self-Efficacy. Medical Journal of Mashhad university of Medical Sciences, 63(2), 2391-2401. https://doi.org/10.22038/mjms.2020.16166 [in Persian]
Fisher, M. J., & King, J. (2010). The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), Technologies, 27*(3), 3451–3472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2
Freudenberg, B., & Samarkovski, L. (2022). Enthusiasm and the effective modern academic. ERIC Journal, EJ1018006.
Habibi-Kaleybar, R., & Qabadi, L. (2020). The relationship between self-directed learning and academic vitality with the mediating role of academic motivation. Educational Research, 7(41), 123–139. http://erj.khu.ac.ir/article-1-828-fa.html [in Persian]
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Izadpanah, S., & Rezaei, Y. M. (2022). Academic enthusiasm and teacher-student interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:997903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997903
Javadi Alami, L., & Asadzadeh, H. (2020). Structural equation modeling of students’ academic engagement based on academic help-seeking, transformative teaching, and social support with the mediating role of academic vitality. Social Psychology Research, 37(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.22034/spr.2020.109699 [in Persian]
Liu, Z., Gao, Y., Zhang, N., Long, T., Liu, S., & Peng, X. (2024). Effects of self-regulated learning on cognitive engagement and learning achievement in online discussions. Current Psychology, 43, 28147–28162.
Lourenço, A., Paiva, M. O., & Valente, S. (2025). Strategies That Transform: Self-regulation and volitional control as keys to academic achievement. Social Sciences, 14(5), 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050285
Loyola-Carrillo, P., Vega-Muñoz, A., Salazar-Sepúlveda. (2025). Studying Engagement in Educational Settings: A Mapping Review on High-Impact Academic Engagement Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1519509
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149.
Martínez-López, Z., Moran, V.E., Mayo, M.E. et al. (2024). Perceived social support and its relationship with self-regulated learning, goal orientation self-management, and academic achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00752-y
Meng, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Student engagement in classroom activities: A behavioral perspective. Educational Psychology Review.
Moghadasi, J., & Keikavoosi-Arani, L. (2023). Investigating the factors influencing students’ academic enthusiasm for a shift of paradigm among education managers shaping academic pedagogy. BMC Med Educ 23, 480(2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04453-4
Müller, F. H., Thomas, A. E., Carmignola, M., Dittrich, A.-K., Eckes, A., Großmann, N., Martinek, D., Wilde, M., & Bieg, S. (2021). University students’ basic psychological needs, motivation, and vitality before and during COVID-19: A self-determination theory approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 775804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775804
Nadi, M. A., & Sadjadian, I. (2011). Validation of a Self- Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Medical and Dentistry Students. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(2), 174–182. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1274-fa.html [in Persian]
Poots, A., & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, and student wellbeing. International Journal of Educational Research, 99:101506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101506
Rezaei, N. Shateri,K., Jayervand, H. (2025). The Structural Model for Enhancing Teachers’ Job Performance: The Effect of Social Capital and Self-Efficacy through the Mediation of Psychological Hardiness. Scientific Journal of Social Psychology,77(13) ,1-18.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Self-Determination Theory Handbook.
Sepahvand, A., Monirpour, N., & Zargham Hajebi, M. (2022). Predicting academic engagement based on self-directed learning and academic identity. Journal of Excellence in Counseling and Psychotherapy, 11(41), 71–88. [in Persian]
Shadkam, H., Yaqoobi, A., Zangeneh Motalq, F., Pirani, Z., & Mohagheghi, H. (2021). Developing a model of academic vitality based on meaning in life mediated by happiness in students. Positive Psychology Research Journal, 7(4), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22108/ppls.2022.131247.2217 [in Persian]
Shahmoradi, M., & Mirzaeifar, D. (2024). Predicting academic vitality based on self-regulation and academic identity in students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences Review, 1(3).
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. Key readings in social psychology. In J. T. Jost and J. Sidanius, (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings, Key readings in social psychology (pp. 276-293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Talepasand, S., Mohanna, S., & Rostami, S. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Academic Engagement instrument in high school students. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 9(26), 7–28. https://sid.ir/paper/255224/fa [in Persian]
Tortosa, B. M., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., & Molero Jurado, M. M. (2024). The influence of perceived social support on academic engagement among adolescents: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Anales de Psicología, 40(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.587991
Vaz, S., & Isaacson, L. (2008). Academic IdentityAcademic Identity Status Questionnaire Status Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Unpublished manuscript.
Wu, J., & Liu, S. (2019). A comparative study of educational placement and school adjustment of children with cochlear implants between China and Czech Republic. Children and Youth Services Review, 103, 107-115.
Yang, Y., Chen, J., & Zhuang, X. (2025). Self-determination theory and the influence of social support, self-regulated learning, and flow experience on student engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1545980.